THE LATEST
« »

Wednesday, November 15, 2006

Why is Bipartisanship More Important with Dems than the GOP?

Molly Ivins on the bipartisan happy talk going around lately:

AlterNet:

Having watched election coverage nonstop all week, I sometimes wake screaming, "Bipartisanship!" and scare myself.

Of all the viral members of the media who have been suggesting that the Dems cooperate with their political opponents, the one who rendered me almost unconscious with surprise was Newt Gingrich.

Newt Gingrich, the Boy Scout. Newt Gingrich, the man who sat there and watched Congress impeach and try Bill Clinton for lying about having an extramarital affair while he, Newt Gingrich, was lying about having an extramarital affair. (This all took place during his second marriage. The first one ended when he told his wife he was divorcing her while she was in the hospital undergoing cancer treatment.)

This is the level of Republican hypocrisy that reminds us all how far the Dems have to go. I tell you what. Let's all hold hands together and sing, "Oh the Farmers and the Cowboys Should Be Friends!" Just not, please, Newt Gingrich, the man whose contribution to civility was to recommend that all Democrats be referred to with such words as cowards, traitors, commies, godless, liars and other such bipartisan-promoting terms.

Please, anyone but Newt.


Nice to know I'm not the only one mightily annoyed by the scolding from the MSM that dems have to be 'bipartisan.' Where have these people been all these years? Why do the Democrats need to be lectured on bipartisanship when it's been the GOP who've been mired in rank partisanship for literally decades?

Tags:

Search Archive:

Custom Search