clipped from www.mcclatchydc.com
|
"Congress has not authorized the executive branch to waive any of the above statutory requirements governing the State Fiscal Stabilization Fund," Orszag wrote. "Accordingly, states' spending... must satisfy the statutory requirements."
It looks like states who want to fill their budget holes with federal taxpayer dollars will have to push for separate legislation. Somehow, I don't see Sanford begging for a taxpayer-funded bail-out for S. Carolina -- it'd look bad when he runs for president in '12.
It looks like states who want to fill their budget holes with federal taxpayer dollars will have to push for separate legislation. Somehow, I don't see Sanford begging for a taxpayer-funded bail-out for S. Carolina -- it'd look bad when he runs for president in '12.
1 comments:
Imagine you're in Sanford's shoes. You could pay the money, as intended, to teachers and cops and civil servants. But wouldn't you rather "pay off government debt" - i.e. buy back bonds, which have been bought by people who had money to invest - i.e. rich people, who may now be feeling less rich?
Let's see... of these two groups, which is more likely to express its gratitude at the Republican primaries in 2012?
Sanford wants to buy votes, and resents the fact that Obama is buying them instead.
Post a Comment