Politico:
Republicans are worried one thing could screw up the political gift of
three Obama administration controversies at once: fellow Republicans.
Top GOP leaders are privately warning members to put a sock in it
when it comes to silly calls for impeachment or over-the-top comparisons
to Watergate. They want members to focus on months of fact-finding
investigations — not rhetorical fury.
[…]
“We have
to be persistent but patient,” Republican National Committee Chairman
Reince Priebus told us. “I think where there’s smoke, there’s fire. If
we present ourselves to the American people as intelligent, we’re going
to be in a great place as far as showing that this administration is not
transparent, is obsessed with power and hates dissent. But you don’t
call for impeachment until you have evidence.”
A
GOP aide explains the problem. “When one committee is leading something
and some members feel left out, they’ll step out there and make an
accusation to get attention,” the aide said. And rightwing media is most
definitely
not helping. The base is convinced that Benghazi is
literally the worst thing ever!
because rightwing media hacks keep telling them what they want to hear
to boost their ratings. Fox host Mike Huckabee, for example, told his
audience, “I believe that before it’s all over, this president will not
fill out his full term.”
Of course the base
is the
base because they’re chumps who believe whatever BS people like Huckabee
throws at them, so elected Republicans must keep getting letters asking
when they’re going to stop dicking around and get to the impeachment
already. It’s like a hyperbolic feedback loop; some Republican says
something over the top, someone like Huckabee picks up on it and amps it
up further, forcing Republicans to match the hysterical fervor of the
hacks audiences. Lather, rinse, repeat. They’re spinning closer and
closer to overreach and it’s beginning to look pretty inevitable — their
Benghazi hype has taken on a life of its own.
And Darrell Issa
isn’t helping either. Sooner or later, he’s going to have to produce
something other than teasers and that means calling Hillary Clinton\back
to testify. According to Politico:
A Democratic
strategist, knowledgeable about administration thinking, maintains that
calling Clinton back would be seen as an “extreme and unprecedented
stunt” and “quite a risky proposition” for House Republicans. “Congress
had her an entire day in January, and she kicked their ass,” the
strategist said. “If she performed that well a second time, they could
lose the issue permanently. They are better off waiting until her
numbers soften with time and as she comes back down to earth — in the
meantime, beating the drum as a midterm issue that she is ducking and
hiding.”
“One aide said there are plans to
stretch this probe into 2014,” the report tells us. That would seem to
give Americans plenty of time to tire of watching them beat this
particular dead horse.
[
photo via Wikimedia Commons]