Misdirected violence alienates those we are claiming to protect. It plays into the hands of the insurgents, advancing their cause and undercutting our own. It fatally undermines the campaign to win hearts and minds, suggesting to Iraqis and Americans alike that Iraqi civilians -- and perhaps Arabs and Muslims more generally -- are expendable. Certainly, Nahiba Husayif Jassim's death helped clarify her brother's perspective on the war. "God take revenge on the Americans and those who brought them here," he declared after the incident. "They have no regard for our lives."
He was being unfair, of course. It's not that we have no regard for Iraqi lives; it's just that we have much less regard for them. The current reparations policy -- the payment offered in those instances in which U.S. forces do own up to killing an Iraq civilian -- makes the point. The insurance payout to the beneficiaries of an American soldier who dies in the line of duty is $400,000, while in the eyes of the U.S. government, a dead Iraqi civilian is reportedly worth up to $2,500 in condolence payments -- about the price of a decent plasma-screen TV.
Bacevich wasn't an idle spectator -- an armchair general criticizing the occupation from afar. He had what Al Franken used to refer to as 'skin in the game.' His son, Army 1st Lt. Andrew J. Bacevich, was stationed in Iraq.
Lt. Bacevich was killed by a roadside bomb in Balad sunday -- Mother's Day. It's difficult not to give his father a certain added moral authority, the same authority we've afforded Cindy Sheehan. Those who've lost someone are those who may know best the true cost of the occupation. And it shouldn't be lost that the elder Bacevich had written that giving more importance to the death of americans than those of iraqis is a terrible mistake...
[CLICK TO READ FULL POST]
