clipped from www.mcclatchydc.com
|
Here's a fun question for the "strict constructionist" Scalia -- if this is true, why would 2nd amendment mention militias at all? And why doesn't it mention self-defense?
Scalia's never been a "strict constructionist." All that means is "someone who'll be a judicial activist for Republican causes."
Scalia's never been a "strict constructionist." All that means is "someone who'll be a judicial activist for Republican causes."