THE LATEST
« »
Showing posts with label Supreme Court of the United States. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Supreme Court of the United States. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 21, 2011

Stories to Watch: 9/21/11

Not much to report from the home front. Just a gray, cool, boring day. Now here's the news...

***

The reaction to GOP leaders' letter to Ben Bernanke, asking him to stop trying to help the economy, is generating decidedly unmixed reactions from people who know about monetary policy. Mark Thoma says the letter "crosses a line that shouldn't be crossed," Robert Reich says, "Whatever shred of doubt you may have harbored about the determination of congressional Republicans to keep the economy in the dumps through Election Day should now be gone," Steve Collender says, "now that the GOP has made it all but impossible for fiscal policy to be used to improve they economy, they want to make sure that the only other tool the government has at its disposal -- monetary policy -- isn't used either," and Sen. Dick Durbin says, "Republican congressional leaders are telling the Federal Reserve, we believe for the first time in history, that they should not provide in this economy a vehicle for expansion by lowering interest rates. That to me is wrong-headed."

Only far-right bloggers are praising the move, which should tell you all you need to know about just how boneheaded and wrong the whole thing is.

***

Federal Reserve to GOP leadership: "Fuck you."


Rightwing blogs have been making a lot of this and, for once, it's actually pretty funny; President Obama really knows how to screw up a group photo.


The United States formally opposes Palestinian statehood. This is kind of dumb, since a "two state solution" necessarily requires two states.


The New York Times calls the scheduled exection of Troy Davis a "grievous wrong," as attorney's for Davis make a last minute appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States.


On the subject of capital punishment and SCOTUS, the high court stopped a second Texas execution this week. Rick Perry's faith in his state's system of justice seems sadly misplaced. As is anyone's faith in a form of punishment where mistakes can never be corrected after the fact.


Sarah Palin continues to dicktease the media.


Finally, Mittens Romney and Rick Perry were once partners in crime.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, June 30, 2011

News Roundup for 6/30/11

Johnson
"It's almost impossible to break campaign finance laws you say?
Challenge accepted"


-Headline of the Day-
"Johnson $10M Payday Could Raise Red Flags For IRS."

When Ron Johnson spent $9 million to win Russ Feingold's senate seat, people saw it as evidence that wealthy frootloops could just buy senate seats with self-funded campaigns. Thank God that's not true. It turns out that Johnson's plastics company, Pacur, bought the seat for him. And Ron came out $1 million ahead after all the smoke had cleared.

According to the report, Ron "received a $10 million payment in deferred compensation from his former plastics company, Pacur, weeks after his $9 million self-financed 2010 campaign for Senate came to an end." Not surprisingly, this is bad. Even with the Citizens United ruling, corporations still can't give corporate money directly to political candidates.

So Johnson found a way to break an election law in an era when there are virtually no election laws.

What an innovator. (Talking Points Memo)


-Cartoon Time with Mark Fiore-
Hey kids, you know how your parents don't like those violent video games? Now you can tell them to shut up and that the Supreme Court agrees with you! Yay!

Supreme Slaughter
Click for animation


Remember kids, boobs = bad and 7.62mm minigun = good! (MarkFiore.com)


-Bonus HotD-
"Outside FEC, Stephen Colbert Says His 'Super PAC' Is No Joke."

Still, check out the video of his announcement for the yuks anyway. (Talking Points Memo, with video)
Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, February 09, 2011

News Roundup for 2/9/11

Man drinks beer on couch
House GOP's work ethic


-Headline of the day-
"Will the 112th Congress work hard -- or hardly work?"

I know what you're thinking; congress hardly worked before. But this is different. As is fitting for a new House Speaker with a fun in the sun, Tom Collins by noon work ethic, there's a new schedule for all those congress critters eager to earn the tax payer's money. And boy, are they ever not going to earn it.

Asks the editorial board of the Christian Science Monitor, "Would you like to earn a week's vacation for every two weeks you work? If so, you should run for Congress. According to the restructured legislative calendar that new House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R) of Virginia has set, House lawmakers in Washington will generally stay in session for two consecutive weeks, then get a week off."

Slick deal, huh? And, if you think about it, it's sort of a backdoor pay raise, since those Reps get paid the same amount regardless of how long they work. On a per hour basis, congressional pay just increased 33%. Yay!

And what are they going to do with all this extra time? Imagine a compound word incorporating "fund" and "raising" and you get the idea. (Christian Science Monitor)


-Not exactly blinded by love-
The new healthcare reform law is almost certain to wind up before the Supreme Court. At this point, the only way I can think of that it wouldn't would be if the court refused to hear the case -- or cases, as those case may be.

So the fact that Ginni Thomas, wife of SCOTUS guy Clarence Thomas, is opening a lobbying shop to give "voice to... the tea party movement in the halls of Congress" has people wondering if Clarence can be all that fair a judge here. In fact, the conflict of interest would be so clear that 74 members of congress are asking him to recuse himself from the case before there even is a case, just to be on the safe side.

"As Members of Congress, we were surprised by recent revelations of your financial ties to leading organizations dedicated to lobbying against the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act," they wrote to Clarence in a letter. "We write today to respectfully ask that you maintain the integrity of this court and recuse yourself from any deliberations on the constitutionality of this act."

They go on to say that "there is a strong conflict between the Thomas household's financial gain through your spouse's activities and your role as an Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court. We urge you to recuse yourself from this case." In fact, hearing the case would stand a damned good chance of violating federal law.

But don't worry, Thomas would probably take any charges against him all the way to the Supreme Court, where we all know he'd dispassionately dispense justice upon himself. (ThinkProgress)


-Bonus HotD-
"Rep. Chris Lee Sending Half-Naked Pics To Ladies On Craigslist."

Care to take a stab at which party he belongs to and how he says he feels about the "sanctity of marriage?"

Got it in one, didn't you? (Wonkette)
Enhanced by Zemanta

Search Archive:

Custom Search